Every
once in awhile you meet a person who is truly passionate about what they do.
These people “wear their heart on a sleeve,” are vocal about their agenda, and
are seemingly oblivious to political and public opinion. Something inside burns--
a cause, a pursuit, a mission,
and that internal fire gives them energy to go into the world arena and
keep at
it. We have many labels for folks like this. Idealist. Crusader.
Radical. Passionate young man. Hawaii attorney Myles S. Breiner is a
youthful looking
50-years-old. But all the previous labels fit, including “passionate
young man.”
| Myles
Breiner pauses during a hectic day in his Honolulu law office. His
years of experience has been earned on both sides of the judicial aisle.
|
Breiner,
has been practicing law for nearly two decades, yet one still senses his
passion and sense of mission when you
sit down to talk story in his downtown Honolulu office. He starts to answer
questions in a rhetorical sense, and by mid-sentence, you know he‘s speaking
from the heart. Breiner views his practice of law more as a “calling,” than
profession and says an oft-quoted line from the Tom Hanks movie, “Philadelphia,” best explains the passion
for what he does.
In
the 1993 picture, actor Tom Hanks plays AIDS stricken attorney Andrew Beckett. When
asked why he pursued a career in litigation, Beckett replied, “It's
that every now and again - not often, but occasionally - you get to be a part
of justice being done. That really is quite a thrill when that happens.”
As
an attorney, Breiner has worked both sides of the aisle. He served as a deputy
under former City and County of Honolulu Prosecutor Charles Marsland, and since 1989, served as a defense attorney. Experience
on both sides of the judicial aisle has given Briener a unique appreciation and
understanding of our system. But justice
has always been paramount for Breiner.
“As
a Deputy Prosecutor, I felt a sense of satisfaction when we got the right
person, and the right sentence,” said Breiner. “And as a defense lawyer, I feel
an even greater satisfaction when someone gets a fair trial, and is either
acquitted or receives an appropriate sentence; not something draconian and
inappropriate, but seeing justice
done. It’s truly rewarding when that happens.”
Breiner
received his undergraduate and graduate education at the University of
Michigan, did post-graduate research at the Chinese University of Hong
Kong and Taiwan National University, and attended law school at the
University of San Francisco. While
attending law school in San Francisco, Breiner clerked for the San
Francisco City Attorney, Office of the
Public Defender, Alameda County District Attorney, California Attorney
General,
and the Marin County Superior Court. Breiner says his term as a
Honolulu Deputy
Prosecutor under Charles Marsland was a rewarding and enlightening
experience.
“A great deal of good can come from the prosecution, assuring the
public that
criminals regardless of their wealth, education or background, receive
fair and
equal treatment, and that no one is above the law.” Nevertheless,
Breiner also recognizes that “with
the tremendous amount of authority given the prosecution, there is also
the
potential for abuse.”
While most of his experiences with the
Honolulu Prosecutor’s Office were positive, he says working as a deputy opened
his eyes to potential abuses within the system. The prosecution is a powerful
institution, Breiner says, and that authority increases the potential for
abuse. Because of the adversarial nature of the criminal justice system, police,
prosecutors, and others working in law enforcement, increasingly vilify
defendants and their defense attorneys, and occasionally step over the line in
their pursuit of justice.
“They
often fail to look at the larger picture,” said Breiner. “In many cases it’s
not just the victims that are victimized, but also, defendants and their
families. An indictment or complaint against a defendant is only an allegation, but that allegation
is very powerful. People believe, rightly or wrongly, if you are charged, then
you must be guilty of something. That’s
a great deal of power to take into a courtroom”
Breiner
says the role of defense is very challenging under these circumstances. “The
defense attorney has a tremendous responsibility and goes into the courtroom
with a difficult task. As a sword and shield, the defense attorney fights for
the defendant’s right to a fair trial, free of prosecutorial abuse, jury
misconduct, or judicial error. “Juries are told the defendant is “innocent
until proven guilty.” Why are they told that? Because people assume anyone
arrested must be guilty of something. Secondly, juries are told the burden of
proof rests upon the prosecution, that people aren’t required to testify in
their own defense. Why? Because people assume the Prosecutor never gets it
wrong and that if someone is innocent, they’ll definitely testify. That is not
what the law says, and at times it is very difficult to convince a jury that
the defendant has a right to remain silent because they are presumed innocent.”
Breiner
says because of the responsibility placed in his hands, being a defense
attorney can be stressful and exhausting, but also very rewarding precisely
because of the challenges and the stakes involved. More importantly, according
to Breiner is, “Every once in awhile you help the right person, get the right
result. Just because you do that, doesn’t mean a guilty person is going free. Some people deserve to be acquitted, or found
guilty of a lesser offense.”

| Breiner
see's his position as not just defending his client, but also as a
"watch dog" to insure balance and fairness in the judicial system.
| Breiner
admits our judicial system is far from perfect but one that is envied by many
who live in nations not accorded our citizen’s rights.
“American citizenship is a much sought after prize, if
for no other reason, than the legal rights and protections accorded its
citizens,” said Breiner. “We have a legal system where defendants can confront
their accusers and present witnesses on their behalf. Few nations have the same
standard. In many countries, the arresting authorities literally play the role
of prosecutor, judge and jury.
Breiner
stresses the need for a vigorous defense as essential to a fair judicial
system. The defense, he says, is the “watch dog,” a part of the check and
balance system, necessary to insure that our rights are respected and that the
police and prosecution are not all-powerful.
“The system doesn’t work without vigorous defense
attorneys,” Breiner says. “The Prosecutors and police may complain. Politicians
may lament, but we keep the system honest.
People often say negative things about the defense until they need a defense
attorney. Until you’re actually accused of a crime, it’s easy to blame defense
attorneys and the criminal justice system for the problem. Critics often say we
need to restrict the rights of criminal defendants, and increase penalties,
while reducing our constitutional right to challenge the evidence.”
That stance is ironic, says Breiner. “When someone in a
position of authority does get
charged, the first thing they do is run to a defense attorney, hire them, and
demand their rights be protected.”
When asked the inevitable, “How can you defend such a
person” question, Breiner says that a defense attorney’s job is not simply to
“defend”, but to insure his client’s right have been protected, and that the
prosecution has not abused their authority in the pursuit of justice.”
Breiner mentions “The Innocence Project” (http://www.innocenceproject.org/),
a non-profit legal clinic and criminal justice resource center that works to
free the wrongly imprisoned through post-conviction DNA testing. According to
their website, the Innocence Project has exonerated 159 people to date. Breiner
champions this cause and says it personifies why he thousands of his
contemporaries do what they do.
“If anything, the Innocence Project is a resounding
endorsement of why we need criminal
defense attorneys and why we need to support the Constitution, the Bill of
Rights, and the 4th Amendment right to challenge the procedure of
evidence,” said Breiner.
It goes back to the movie quote, and re-watching the
courtroom scene in Philadelphia, you can easily picture Breiner on the stand,
verbalizing the same passion.
“It's
that every now and again - not often, but occasionally - you get to be a part
of justice being done. That really is
quite a thrill when that happens.”
|